Barack Obama, who says he has won the Democratic Presidential Primary season, has been unable to seal the deal with voters, and more importantly the superdelegates.
If he is the winner, why is Hillary Clinton still running an impressive campaign and claiming after Florida and Michigan are seated she will hold the actual lead in popular votes and delegates? Also, you would figure that the superdelegates would flock to Obama's category en masse. But this hasn't happened.
Also, didn't Senator Obama say that the superdelegates should vote for the candidate that their constituents elected? I think he did, in fact. Now he says superdelegates may vote for any candidate they please. Case in point, naturally, is New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, who is a superdelegate and supporter of Obama, despite the fact his state voted for Hillary Clinton. Why did Obama flip-flop on such an important issue?
Perhaps, Obama is not the candidate for president, after all. Actually, it might be up the voters of this country to decide who will be its next president, instead of the media and junior United States senator from Illinois.
Just like his exaggeration about his uncle liberating the hellish Nazi concentration camp, Auschwitz, which turned out to be his great-uncle, who aided in the liberation of another concentration camp, Buchenwald. (Fortunately for him, it wasn't his crazy uncle, Jeremiah Wright, this time!)
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Yes, Congress Can!
Congress voted to override the president's veto on the farm bill, which he previously denied less than 24 hours before.
Finally, I can find out where the food I buy comes from! Why is such a bad idea, George W. Bush?
Also, in my previous blog about this event, I said it would be the first time Congress has voted to override one of Bush's vetoes. In fact, it is the second time.
Finally, I can find out where the food I buy comes from! Why is such a bad idea, George W. Bush?
Also, in my previous blog about this event, I said it would be the first time Congress has voted to override one of Bush's vetoes. In fact, it is the second time.
An Affirmative Action Presidency
The United States has built the past fifty years on giving those whose ancestors spent the previous 175 years in oppression a better than average chance of becoming a proactive member of society.
This year, many American voters--now superdelegates--are thinking about affirmative action again. Of course, they aren't discussing it openly, but it is apparent that this election is not about qualifications, regarding who is best suited for leading our nation on January 20, 2009 and beyond, but it is about making sure one candidate in particular gets the last word in every public debate.
Sexism is still one of the last discriminatory vices we can giggle about privately and make veiled comments about on television and in movies without real retribution from the larger community, which is the American public. That's why another candidate is the scapegoat for what is wrong in our country. In other words, it is okay to put down a woman, but you better not do the same to a black man, or you will be quickly labeled a racist. There is a sinister dichotomy which exists in our equal rights/affirmative action laws.
I am not prepared for an affirmative action presidency. America does not need a post-Bush president who requires on-the-job training. Let's not allow our emotions to dictate who our next president will be. Furthermore, let's not allow inevitability to sway our minds when it comes to thinking of the greater nation we want to build in the many years ahead.
This year, many American voters--now superdelegates--are thinking about affirmative action again. Of course, they aren't discussing it openly, but it is apparent that this election is not about qualifications, regarding who is best suited for leading our nation on January 20, 2009 and beyond, but it is about making sure one candidate in particular gets the last word in every public debate.
Sexism is still one of the last discriminatory vices we can giggle about privately and make veiled comments about on television and in movies without real retribution from the larger community, which is the American public. That's why another candidate is the scapegoat for what is wrong in our country. In other words, it is okay to put down a woman, but you better not do the same to a black man, or you will be quickly labeled a racist. There is a sinister dichotomy which exists in our equal rights/affirmative action laws.
I am not prepared for an affirmative action presidency. America does not need a post-Bush president who requires on-the-job training. Let's not allow our emotions to dictate who our next president will be. Furthermore, let's not allow inevitability to sway our minds when it comes to thinking of the greater nation we want to build in the many years ahead.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Will George W. Bush get his veto overridden by Congress?
President Bush vetoed a farm subsidies bill today. Bush said it gave too much preference to big scale farmers, rather than average farmers. Why does Bush care about the common person now? He has invested billions in tax breaks for the wealthy, including corporate subsidies, and now he is worried about impacting the middle class.
I find this curious, to say the least.
Congress for the first time in Bush's tenure as president of the United States is poised to override his veto. Does this mark the final demise of President Bush? He is now seen as a pariah by his own political party.
Poor George.
I find this curious, to say the least.
Congress for the first time in Bush's tenure as president of the United States is poised to override his veto. Does this mark the final demise of President Bush? He is now seen as a pariah by his own political party.
Poor George.
Bruce Lunsford goes on to face Mitch McConnell
Last night, in addition to Hillary easily winning Kentucky's Democratic primary, Bruce Lunsford won the Democratic Party's nomination as senator. He now goes on to face incumbent, Mitch McConnell (R), who has been in the United States Senate for almost 24-years. McConnell is the Minority Leader in the Senate, also.
It will be a hard fought battle to unseat Kentucky's mighty Senator McConnell. I think it will not be as easy for Senator McConnell this election cycle to win his re-election bid, however. Let's hope that the voters of Kentucky decide to put him out to pasture. He's been in the Senate too long, and his policies are not ours.
It will be a hard fought battle to unseat Kentucky's mighty Senator McConnell. I think it will not be as easy for Senator McConnell this election cycle to win his re-election bid, however. Let's hope that the voters of Kentucky decide to put him out to pasture. He's been in the Senate too long, and his policies are not ours.
How many?
By how many points did I say Hillary would win Kentucky?
Yes, I said 35-points! And guess what? She did!
Yes, I said 35-points! And guess what? She did!
Go Hillary!
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Hillary Clinton wins Kentucky Primary
It's funny.
Today, while driving around my part of Kentucky, I noticed something. There are no Barack Obama yard signs. Everywhere, however, there are Hillary signs. They appear on people's lawns, next to the road, stuck on trees, almost anywhere you can tack (or tape) one up.
In the spirit of that commitment, Kentucky has delivered Senator Clinton another victory for her campaign to be the president of the United States.
Keep on rollin', Hillary! You go with the Bluegrass state's blessing.
Today, while driving around my part of Kentucky, I noticed something. There are no Barack Obama yard signs. Everywhere, however, there are Hillary signs. They appear on people's lawns, next to the road, stuck on trees, almost anywhere you can tack (or tape) one up.
In the spirit of that commitment, Kentucky has delivered Senator Clinton another victory for her campaign to be the president of the United States.
Keep on rollin', Hillary! You go with the Bluegrass state's blessing.
Monday, May 19, 2008
Hillary for Kentucky
According to recent polls conducted in Kentucky, Hillary Clinton will handily win the state tomorrow in its primary.
I predict a win of at least 35-points!
I predict a win of at least 35-points!
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Bombast?
Barack Obama accused President George W. Bush and Senator John McCain of engaging in a war of "bombast" when it comes to Iraq.
Now, like the rest of America, I'm wondering what does "bombast" mean? At first, I tried to use some reasoning skills and I determined it means they were carpet bombing Americans in some metaphorical way. Then I realized it is George W. Bush, so nothing is metaphorical from his standpoint.
Being a good teacher, I decided to look the word up in the dictionary. Bombast means "pretentious speech." I think the only pretentious person in that group is Barack Obama.
Go back to your thesaurus Obama!
Now, like the rest of America, I'm wondering what does "bombast" mean? At first, I tried to use some reasoning skills and I determined it means they were carpet bombing Americans in some metaphorical way. Then I realized it is George W. Bush, so nothing is metaphorical from his standpoint.
Being a good teacher, I decided to look the word up in the dictionary. Bombast means "pretentious speech." I think the only pretentious person in that group is Barack Obama.
Go back to your thesaurus Obama!
Hillary 2008
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Kentucky Governors Endorse Hillary for President
From www.HillaryClinton.com:
"After a landslide victory in West Virginia, the Clinton Campaign today announced that former Kentucky Governors Wendell Ford, Paul Patton, John Brown, and Julian Carroll are endorsing Hillary for President. The endorsements demonstrate the widespread support Hillary continues to receive throughout the Bluegrass State."
"After a landslide victory in West Virginia, the Clinton Campaign today announced that former Kentucky Governors Wendell Ford, Paul Patton, John Brown, and Julian Carroll are endorsing Hillary for President. The endorsements demonstrate the widespread support Hillary continues to receive throughout the Bluegrass State."
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Hillary crushes Obama in West Virginia
For a race that many people consider as being over, it is amazing that the candidate they want to concede is still winning states!
Hillary Clinton won 67% of the vote yesterday in West Virginia. That hardly sounds like a candidate who should be packing her bags. She is up for a big win in Kentucky next Tuesday, also!
Hillary Clinton won 67% of the vote yesterday in West Virginia. That hardly sounds like a candidate who should be packing her bags. She is up for a big win in Kentucky next Tuesday, also!
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Hillary Clinton wins West Virginia
As predicted, Hillary Clinton has won the West Virginia Democratic primary.
On to Kentucky next Tuesday!
On to Kentucky next Tuesday!
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Hillary Clinton is no vice president
Some people are calling for Hillary and Obama to come together and form a unified Democratic presidential ticket for November. Of course, they put Hillary at the bottom of the ticket.
Why should Hillary be forced into contrition? I do not see her as a vice president. The whole idea is rather insulting to her stature. I do see an alternative for Hillary, if the Democratic Party is dead-fire sure it is going to annoit Barack Obama as its candidate.
Hillary can be the true maverick candidate of this election cycle and run for the presidency as an independent. She has a hardcore base of supporters across the political spectrum--Democrats, Republicans and Independents.
Senator Clinton will stand as the alternative to John McCain and Barack Obama for the presidency. There have been candidates who have thrown their hats into the arena as independents, such as Ross Perot and Ralph Nader (what happened to him this election cycle, anyhow?), but none of them have been equal to Hillary in caliber. After all, her base is deeply fractured when the name Barack Obama is mentioned as their party's candidate.
In the final analysis, Hillary may accept the second spot on the ticket, she may win the top position on the ticket on her own merits, but it is premature and ill-informed to say she is out of this election!
Why should Hillary be forced into contrition? I do not see her as a vice president. The whole idea is rather insulting to her stature. I do see an alternative for Hillary, if the Democratic Party is dead-fire sure it is going to annoit Barack Obama as its candidate.
Hillary can be the true maverick candidate of this election cycle and run for the presidency as an independent. She has a hardcore base of supporters across the political spectrum--Democrats, Republicans and Independents.
Senator Clinton will stand as the alternative to John McCain and Barack Obama for the presidency. There have been candidates who have thrown their hats into the arena as independents, such as Ross Perot and Ralph Nader (what happened to him this election cycle, anyhow?), but none of them have been equal to Hillary in caliber. After all, her base is deeply fractured when the name Barack Obama is mentioned as their party's candidate.
In the final analysis, Hillary may accept the second spot on the ticket, she may win the top position on the ticket on her own merits, but it is premature and ill-informed to say she is out of this election!
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Has John McCain "lost his bearings"?
John McCain is upset over recent Barack Obama comments that label him as old. Guess what? Senator McCain you are old!
I love this episode of Red State Update, because they discuss the only two people who can be socially accepted as having lost his bearings. Apparently, they are your grandpa, "who gets caught pissing in the produce section at Kroger"--oh, and sea captains, too.
I love this episode of Red State Update, because they discuss the only two people who can be socially accepted as having lost his bearings. Apparently, they are your grandpa, "who gets caught pissing in the produce section at Kroger"--oh, and sea captains, too.
Precipitous Obama
Barack Obama has self-anointed himself the Democratic presidential candidate. I find this ironic, since Hillary Clinton is still in the race. Furthermore, she is going to womp him a big one in the West Virginia and Kentucky primaries.
Why does that matter?
West Virginia and Kentucky are run-of-the-mill blue-collar, queer-hating, church-going, gun-toting, family feuding Democrats. That yellow dog still sits on their porches (and hunts sometimes, too). We love Democrats, because they speak our language, usually.
Although, I am a Kentuckian and a Democrat, I am a rare breed among my kind. I am a progressive, liberal Democrat, which is very, very rare in this part of the country. Most Democrats in Kentucky will vote Republican in national elections--even though, they voted for Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996--they love conservative Democratic values, which sounds like an oxymoron, but it's possible. People in Kentucky and West Virginia see themselves as progressives, but they are a bit apprehensive about it. Basically, it means you can talk about family values, welfare, job issues, etc., as long as you don't mention gun control and abortion. But they won't hold that against you in a national election, unless you "brag" about it, of course.
Now, Hillary Clinton is on the political scene. My Democrats can't wait to vote for her! She is the best thing to happen to Kentucky since Bill Clinton ran for president. You can ask many Kentuckians about the Democrats who are running for president. Most will admit that Obama seems like a nice guy, but they are voting for Hillary, nonetheless. She's their girl!
In November, if Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee, West Virginia and Kentucky will go red, because they will have to place their bets on John McCain. After all, Barack Obama is a Democrat after my own liberal heart, but that does little for your electability in Kentucky. So like the rest of my friends in Kentucky, my vote is with Hillary for president on May 20.
Let's see what the superdelegates have to say about Hillary on May 21! (Obama may be less apt to think he is the king of the Democratic Party.)
Why does that matter?
West Virginia and Kentucky are run-of-the-mill blue-collar, queer-hating, church-going, gun-toting, family feuding Democrats. That yellow dog still sits on their porches (and hunts sometimes, too). We love Democrats, because they speak our language, usually.
Although, I am a Kentuckian and a Democrat, I am a rare breed among my kind. I am a progressive, liberal Democrat, which is very, very rare in this part of the country. Most Democrats in Kentucky will vote Republican in national elections--even though, they voted for Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996--they love conservative Democratic values, which sounds like an oxymoron, but it's possible. People in Kentucky and West Virginia see themselves as progressives, but they are a bit apprehensive about it. Basically, it means you can talk about family values, welfare, job issues, etc., as long as you don't mention gun control and abortion. But they won't hold that against you in a national election, unless you "brag" about it, of course.
Now, Hillary Clinton is on the political scene. My Democrats can't wait to vote for her! She is the best thing to happen to Kentucky since Bill Clinton ran for president. You can ask many Kentuckians about the Democrats who are running for president. Most will admit that Obama seems like a nice guy, but they are voting for Hillary, nonetheless. She's their girl!
In November, if Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee, West Virginia and Kentucky will go red, because they will have to place their bets on John McCain. After all, Barack Obama is a Democrat after my own liberal heart, but that does little for your electability in Kentucky. So like the rest of my friends in Kentucky, my vote is with Hillary for president on May 20.
Let's see what the superdelegates have to say about Hillary on May 21! (Obama may be less apt to think he is the king of the Democratic Party.)
Thursday, May 08, 2008
Letter to Barack Obama from Hillary Clinton
May 8, 2008
Senator Barack Obama Obama for America
P.O. Box 8102
Chicago, IL 60680
Dear Senator Obama,
This has been an historic and exciting campaign. Millions of new voters have been brought into the process and their enthusiasm for the Democratic Party and the principles for which you and I have fought and continue to fight is unprecedented.
One of the foremost principles of our party is that citizens be allowed to vote and that those votes be counted. That principle is not currently being applied to the nearly 2.5 million people who voted in primaries in Florida and Michigan. Whoever emerges as the Democratic nominee will be hamstrung in the general election if a fair and quick resolution is not reached that ensures that the voices of these voters are heard. Our commitment now to this goal could be the difference between winning and losing in November.
I have consistently said that the votes cast in Florida and Michigan in January should be counted. We cannot ignore the fact that the people in those states took the time to be a part of this process and to make their preferences known. When efforts were untaken by leaders in those states to hold revotes to ensure that they had a voice in selecting our nominee, I supported those efforts. In Michigan, I supported a legislative effort to hold a revote that the Democratic National Committee said was in complete compliance with the party's rules. You did not support those efforts and your supporters in Michigan publicly opposed them. In Florida a number of revote options were proposed. I am not aware of any that you supported. In 2000, the Republicans won an election by successfully opposing a fair counting of votes in Florida. As Democrats, we must reject any proposals that would do the same.
Your commitment to the voters of these states must be clearly stated and your support for a fair and quick resolution must be clearly demonstrated.
I am asking you to join me in working with representatives from Florida and Michigan and the Democratic National Committee to arrive at a solution that honors the votes of the millions of people who went to the polls in Florida and Michigan. It is not enough to simply seat their representatives at the convention in Denver. The people of these great states, like the people who have voted and are to vote in other states, must have a voice in selecting our party's nominee.
Sincerely,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Senator Barack Obama Obama for America
P.O. Box 8102
Chicago, IL 60680
Dear Senator Obama,
This has been an historic and exciting campaign. Millions of new voters have been brought into the process and their enthusiasm for the Democratic Party and the principles for which you and I have fought and continue to fight is unprecedented.
One of the foremost principles of our party is that citizens be allowed to vote and that those votes be counted. That principle is not currently being applied to the nearly 2.5 million people who voted in primaries in Florida and Michigan. Whoever emerges as the Democratic nominee will be hamstrung in the general election if a fair and quick resolution is not reached that ensures that the voices of these voters are heard. Our commitment now to this goal could be the difference between winning and losing in November.
I have consistently said that the votes cast in Florida and Michigan in January should be counted. We cannot ignore the fact that the people in those states took the time to be a part of this process and to make their preferences known. When efforts were untaken by leaders in those states to hold revotes to ensure that they had a voice in selecting our nominee, I supported those efforts. In Michigan, I supported a legislative effort to hold a revote that the Democratic National Committee said was in complete compliance with the party's rules. You did not support those efforts and your supporters in Michigan publicly opposed them. In Florida a number of revote options were proposed. I am not aware of any that you supported. In 2000, the Republicans won an election by successfully opposing a fair counting of votes in Florida. As Democrats, we must reject any proposals that would do the same.
Your commitment to the voters of these states must be clearly stated and your support for a fair and quick resolution must be clearly demonstrated.
I am asking you to join me in working with representatives from Florida and Michigan and the Democratic National Committee to arrive at a solution that honors the votes of the millions of people who went to the polls in Florida and Michigan. It is not enough to simply seat their representatives at the convention in Denver. The people of these great states, like the people who have voted and are to vote in other states, must have a voice in selecting our party's nominee.
Sincerely,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
I can decide for myself
Hillary Clinton won Indiana and Barack Obama won North Carolina. In that sense, yesterday's primaries were a draw between the two candidates; however, the media makes it out to be a death sentence for Hillary.
Why does North Carolina get to decide who is my president? Kentucky has a primary May 20. I am more than able to cast my own vote, thank you very much biased, Obama-loving media.
Today, I was pretty excited (along with the people to whom I was speaking) about the fact Kentucky will have a primary that will actually count. In fact, I said, "This is the first primary election in which Kentucky's voters matter!" (That I can recall, of course.) My friends were excited that the candidates would actually campaign here. It's different seeing them on television as compared to seeing them in person.
So, media, chill out! This primary season will be over in June. Let's not forget that Florida and Michigan must be seated at the convention, also. And we all know Hillary won both of those states. Will that change the dynamic of this primary season? I think so.
The media, once again, is down-playing Hillary Clinton's viability in this election. As far as I can tell, it's not over yet!
Why does North Carolina get to decide who is my president? Kentucky has a primary May 20. I am more than able to cast my own vote, thank you very much biased, Obama-loving media.
Today, I was pretty excited (along with the people to whom I was speaking) about the fact Kentucky will have a primary that will actually count. In fact, I said, "This is the first primary election in which Kentucky's voters matter!" (That I can recall, of course.) My friends were excited that the candidates would actually campaign here. It's different seeing them on television as compared to seeing them in person.
So, media, chill out! This primary season will be over in June. Let's not forget that Florida and Michigan must be seated at the convention, also. And we all know Hillary won both of those states. Will that change the dynamic of this primary season? I think so.
The media, once again, is down-playing Hillary Clinton's viability in this election. As far as I can tell, it's not over yet!
Tuesday, May 06, 2008
The Obama Bias of CNN
During the Pennsylvania primary, it was clear that Hillary Clinton was the winner; however, CNN refused to designate her the winner at the end of the primary (based on the exit polls, of course).
Tonight, CNN, based on similar information in North Carolina, did not hesitate to declare Barack Obama the winner in North Carolina. I could see the venom on Wolf Blitzer's teeth gleam as he waited for the final second to pass before 7:30pm. It was breaking news, of course!
I suppose they were having some Obama withdrawal, since he hadn't won a primary in about two months.
I think the ultimate pro-Clinton conceit would be if Hillary Clinton ended up winning North Carolina and they had to retract their projection. Talk about eating crow!
How long will they make Hillary wait before they project her the winner in Indiana? It is certain they will make her wait until almost the very end. (They have to adequately stroke the Obama ego.)
Tonight, CNN, based on similar information in North Carolina, did not hesitate to declare Barack Obama the winner in North Carolina. I could see the venom on Wolf Blitzer's teeth gleam as he waited for the final second to pass before 7:30pm. It was breaking news, of course!
I suppose they were having some Obama withdrawal, since he hadn't won a primary in about two months.
I think the ultimate pro-Clinton conceit would be if Hillary Clinton ended up winning North Carolina and they had to retract their projection. Talk about eating crow!
How long will they make Hillary wait before they project her the winner in Indiana? It is certain they will make her wait until almost the very end. (They have to adequately stroke the Obama ego.)
Monday, May 05, 2008
Is Laura Bush running for office?
Today, it would seem that United States effort to get aid into the Asian nation of Myanmar (Burma), after being tragically ravaged by a hurricane on Friday, is in the hands of First Lady Laura Bush.
This is the largest role I have ever seen her take, especially on the foreign affairs stage. It almost makes me think she is mapping her own political future after hubby, George W. Bush, leaves office in January.
Could she be a senator from Texas? A member of the House of Representatives, perhaps? It just seems an odd time for her to step out of her relative obscurity.
This is the largest role I have ever seen her take, especially on the foreign affairs stage. It almost makes me think she is mapping her own political future after hubby, George W. Bush, leaves office in January.
Could she be a senator from Texas? A member of the House of Representatives, perhaps? It just seems an odd time for her to step out of her relative obscurity.
Sunday, May 04, 2008
What has Barack Obama done for America?
Pie in the sky is what Senator Barack Obama has promised Americans, since he began his bid for the White House over a year-and-half ago.
Can he deliver any real solutions based on what he has merely promised?
Take one minute (Google is your friend), and try to discover what Obama has done that is good for America. Good luck! Like most of his avid supporters, you may still be asking yourself, "What has he done?" Really.
Obama, who is jealous because he didn't come up with the gasoline tax holiday, has belittled Hillary Clinton for not simply being a thinker, like him, but a doer. It's funny, considering how much money he is spending in North Carolina and Indiana (I see the Indiana ads, too) on television and print ads to defeat someone he thinks is politically dead. At the same, however, instead of the poll numbers widening in those states, they are tightening.
Hillary may not have all of the answers, but she does think of ways to make her ideas reality. It is not simply enough to say things will happen. You must show us how they are going to happen. Talk to the voters about meat-and-potato issues. Those are the things they can sink their teeth into and chew around while they think. Americans are wising up to the reality of this presidential race.
Barack Obama cannot win the white, blue-collar Democratic vote in November. He has too many things against him at the moment. These voters are turned off by his racist, America-hating minister, and his elitist comments about guns and religion in San Francisco (of all places). Barack Obama is like Deputy Barney Fife. With all of his good intentions aside, someone needs to take the bullets out of his gun before he shoots himself to death!
Can he deliver any real solutions based on what he has merely promised?
Take one minute (Google is your friend), and try to discover what Obama has done that is good for America. Good luck! Like most of his avid supporters, you may still be asking yourself, "What has he done?" Really.
Obama, who is jealous because he didn't come up with the gasoline tax holiday, has belittled Hillary Clinton for not simply being a thinker, like him, but a doer. It's funny, considering how much money he is spending in North Carolina and Indiana (I see the Indiana ads, too) on television and print ads to defeat someone he thinks is politically dead. At the same, however, instead of the poll numbers widening in those states, they are tightening.
Hillary may not have all of the answers, but she does think of ways to make her ideas reality. It is not simply enough to say things will happen. You must show us how they are going to happen. Talk to the voters about meat-and-potato issues. Those are the things they can sink their teeth into and chew around while they think. Americans are wising up to the reality of this presidential race.
Barack Obama cannot win the white, blue-collar Democratic vote in November. He has too many things against him at the moment. These voters are turned off by his racist, America-hating minister, and his elitist comments about guns and religion in San Francisco (of all places). Barack Obama is like Deputy Barney Fife. With all of his good intentions aside, someone needs to take the bullets out of his gun before he shoots himself to death!
Hillary for President
Friday, May 02, 2008
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)