Bagdad v. London

I was just wondering how the deaths in London compare to the daily deaths of Iraqis and Americans in Iraq? Basically, there are bombings daily in the country of Iraq that kill its citizens. These attacks are the product of terrorism, but they get no more than 2 minutes of mention on the evening news.

So my question is are the lives of Londoners more important than those of Iraqis? The answer is simple, no they're not, but the deaths that occur in Iraq do not support the success of the American military occupation of that country. Additionally, the deaths of the British continue to support Bush's scare tactics of the need for continued support of his foreign policies.

Ugh!